Original Articles Open access

Preliminary report on left-ventricular assist devices: are patients’ and caregivers’ psychosocial needs adequately addressed?

[Rapporto preliminare sui dispositivi di assistenza ventricolare sinistra: i bisogni psicosociali di pazienti e caregiver sono adeguatamente soddisfatti?]

Authors

Published
26 February 2025
Section
Original Articles
DOI
10.4081/gimle.609
Pages
88-92

Abstract

Objectives. Patients implanted with a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) constitute a new population of chronic heart failure (HF) patients requiring continuous medical support and representing heavy costs - both direct and indirect - for the healthcare system. If there is consensus about the increased survival, the psychosocial outcomes, in terms of psychological wellbeing, behavioral and social functioning of both patients and caregivers, are still unclear. Overall, it is not clear if local health and social services are equipped to support them in their needs. We conducted an observational study on the psychosocial characteristics and needs of LVAD patients.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients admitted for rehabilitation after implantation, and their caregivers were recruited. On admission, patients and caregivers were administered questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, quality of life, level of social complexity and were interviewed about their social resources. At discharge, patients were re-assessed by questionnaires and patients/caregivers received a follow-up phone-interview after 8-12 months.

Results. LVAD patients' emotional well-being and subjective quality of life improved during the rehabilitation stay and they confirmed their satisfaction with LVAD at follow-up. Problems emerged concerning the inadequate health and social assistance that LVAD patients receive once home. More than 50% of patients showed substantial social complexity, the burden of which fell on the caregivers, whose strain hardly declined over time, remaining at a level requiring psychological attention.

Conclusions. Technological advances that improve LVAD patients' survival should be rapidly followed by adequate interventions by policy makers to improve also the local health/social assistance provided and to address patients and caregivers psychosocial needs over time.

References

  1. 1) Birks EJ. The comparative use of ventricular assist devices: differences between Europe and the United States. Tex Heart Inst J 2010; 37(5), 565-7.
  2. 2) Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Myers SL, et al.: INTERMACS Quarterly Statistical Report 2014 2nd Quarter INTERMACS Interag Regist Mech Assist Circ Support http://www.uab.edu/medicine/intermacs/ images/Federal_ Quarterly_Report/Federal_Partners_Report_ 2014_Q2.pdf.
  3. 3) Compostella L, Russo N, Setzu T, Bottio T, Compostella C, Tarzia V, et al. A Practical Review for Cardiac Rehabilitation Professionals of Continuous-Flow Left ventricular assist devices: historical and current perspectives. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2015; 35(5), 301-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000113
  4. 4) Ben Gal T, Jaarsma T. Patients with a left ventricular assist device: the new chronic patient in cardiology. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2012; 11(4), 378-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515112441145
  5. 5) Sakaguchi M, Kitagawa K, Okazaki, Yoshioka D, Sakata Y, Mochizuki H, et al. Sulcus subarachnoid hemorrhage is a common stroke subtype in patients with implanted left ventricular assist devices. Eur J Neurol 2015; 22(7), 1088-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12712
  6. 6) Davis J, Sanford D, Schilling J, Hardi A, Colditz G. Systematic Review of Outcomes after Non-Cardiac Surgery in Patients with Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Devices. ASAIO J 2015; 61(6), 648-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000278
  7. 7) Lampropulos JF, Kim N, Wang Y, Desai MM, Barreto-Filho JA, Dodson JA, et al. Trends in left ventricular assist device use and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 2004-2011. Open Heart 2014; 1(1), e000109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000109
  8. 8) Neyt M, Van den Bruel A, Smit Y, De Jonge N, Vlayen J. The costutility of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure patients ineligible for cardiac transplantation: a systematic review and critical appraisal of economic evaluations. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 3(5), 439-49.
  9. 9) Bruce CR, Delgado E, Kostick K, Grogan S, Ashrith G, Trachtenberg B, et al. Ventricular assist devices: a review of psychosocial risk factors and their impact on outcomes. J Card Fail 2014; 20(12), 996-1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.09.006
  10. 10) Sica C, Coradeschi D, Ghisi M, Sanavio E. BAI. Beck Anxiety Inventory. Firenze: Giunti O.S. 2006.
  11. 11) Ghisi M, Flebus GB, Montano A, Sanavio E, Sica C. BDI-II. Beck Depression Inventory - II. Firenze: Giunti O.S. 2006.
  12. 12) Behlouli H, Feldman DE, Ducharme A, Frenette M, Giannetti N, Grondin F, et al. Identifying relative cut-off scores with neural networks for interpretation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. Conf Proc TEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 6242-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334659
  13. 13) Balestroni G, Bertolotti G. EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2012; 78(3), 155-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2012.121
  14. 14) Braca M, Gavazzi R, Viaggi A. Valutare la condizione sociale degli anziani: un percorso degli Assistenti Sociali a Bologna. Autonomia Locali e Servizi Sociali 2009; 2, 243-256.
  15. 15) Vidotto G, Ferrario SR, Bond TG. Zotti AM. Family Strain Questionnaire - Short Form for nurses and general practitioners. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19(1-2), 275-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02965.x
  16. 16) Cooper LB, Mentz RJ, Sun JL, Schulte PJ, Fleg JL, Cooper LS, et al. Psychosocial Factors, Exercise Adherence, and Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients: Insights From Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training (HF-ACTION). Circ Heart Fail 2015; 8(6), 1044-1051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002327
  17. 17) Heinze JE, Kruger DJ, Reischl TM, Cupal S, Zimmerman MA. Relationships Among Disease, Social Support, and Perceived Health: A Litespan Approach. Am J Community Psychol. 2015; 56 (3), 268-79 18) Maclver J, Ross H. Quality of life and Left Ventricular Assist Device Support. Circulation 2012; 126, 866-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9758-3
  18. 19) Kirkpatrick JN, Kellom K, Hull SC, Henderson R, Singh J, Coyle LA, Mountis M, et al. Caregivers and Left Ventricular Assist Devices as a Destination, Not a Journey. Card Fail 2015; 21(10), 806-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.05.016
  19. 20) Gemmil M. Research note: Chronic Disease Management in Europe. Unit El - Social and Demographic Analysis 2008; http:// ec.europa.eu European Commission.
  20. 21) Busse R, Blümel M, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Zentner A. Tackling chronic disease in Europe. Strategies, interventions and challenges. Observatory Studies Series N. 20 2010; World Health Organization 2010, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health, Systems and Policies http://www.euro.who.int 22) Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs MS. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA 2014; 311(10), 1052-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.304

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.

PlumX Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

Most read articles by the same author(s)